Q Do you think that you be the judge case was wrongly decided in this chapter? The court held that a quantity term was required and the sides had not agreed on one. But you can certainly argue this was an output contract - there is no indication both side intended him to sell to anyone else and he was planning to sell everything he produced. So, which side are you on? (note that your participation credit in no way depends on which side you come down on) Would you have held the two parties had a valid contract?
View Related Questions